Doesn't synthetic oil flow better than conventional oil? Therefore doesn't it run back to the crankcase like a scared rabbit leaving little remaining coverage on the engine parts compared to conventional oil. Just saying, watch out for the hype and slanted reports. Currie warns against using synthetic lube in its differentials under hard use and will void warranty if used. Just sayin. All that glitters isn't gold. Actually the additive package for synthetic oil has a stickiness component, so don't worry.
Apparently the 3.6L engine was designed using conventional oil and no extra oil change interval is given for using synthetics. The additive package (the reason I stick with brand names, hard to say what basic package is blended into the house brands), is the
performance package for the oil. A conventional oil with a good additive package will outperform a synthetic oil with a mediocre additive package, so says Royal Purple.
I don't know that Royal Purple makes a conventional oil. They used to make the "real thing" synthetic, not from petroleum like most of todays "synthetics" are. "Quasi" I call them.

A real PAO synthetic will have a much lower cold pour point than todays "quasi" synthetics. That's one way of telling the difference.
As for the base oil, i.e. the carrier oil, synthetic will do the job intended for about twice as long as conventional before it needs changing. Other than that, price is a consideration, sometimes that Mobil stuff is cheap.
To each his own on motor oil. There are things to consider. Right now I'm using Super Tech Synthetic 5W-40 European Formula in my Jeep. That's a Warren Oil product. To me, it's an experiment. Nothing can mess up that 4.0L inline 6.

Except maybe some single platinum spark plugs (another story). Anyway the 2003 Jeep Wrangler engine had a diet mostly of Valvoline conventional oil most of it 300000+ km life and is still going strong.
.